Menu
Your Money
Spanish bank bailout gets go-ahead

Startups will gain from GOP's immigration pain

Knight Capital stock surges on buyout offer from Getco

When to follow the barbarians

The fiscal cliff and private equity

British banks may need more capital

BlackRock's new bond plan

Why 'cheap' stocks aren't always good

Where's the stimulus, Obama?

Eurozone business mood ticks up

Cyber Monday gives eBay a big boost

Goldman Sachs to leave crime scene, exit CSI?

How to really stop (some) insider trading

Why Italian bonds are rallying

Aston Martin at risk of downgrade

Bond investors, beware

U.K. targets Google, Amazon, Starbucks on taxes

BlackRock: There's hidden value in CASSH

Costco's odd fiscal cliff dividend deal

The Fed is backing foreign banks into a corner
Где ежедневно публикуются лучшие секс видео новинки и порно клипы с участием самых красивых девушек | строительство домов
The fiscal cliff and private equity
I was on CNBC Squawk Box this morning to discuss what the fiscal cliff means for private equity. Drum roll... It doesn't mean all that much.

No examples of private equity firms hoarding money or instructing portfolio companies to do so. Moreover, private equity's long-term nature means that it could better survive a fall off the cliff than could most other asset classes (although, of course, a shock recession would harm IRRs – and take a particular bite out of fundraising efforts).

Instead, the real issue for private equity surrounds taxes. It's hard to see how carried interest, for example, wouldn't get sucked into a package of loophole eliminations. That means PE pro taxes would rise, although most PE pros have been expecting that for a while (and mentally accepted it, even if they disagree with the policy). The other tax issue is an expected increase in capital gains rates, which seems almost certain whether or not there is a deal worked out by January 1. That's why we're beginning to see a flurry of deals and deal closures (particularly on the PE sell-side).

I also got asked for the year's big PE winners and losers. Hadn't expected the question, but my gut reaction was that Advent International was a big winner. Raised the largest post-crisis fund, and did so extremely quickly (without having to make major fee concessions to CalPERS, etc.). Didn't get to a loser, but it has to be Bain Capital. Not the firm's fault, but clearly the Romney candidacy wasn't good for Bain's public reputation.

Для печати


Menu
Why aren't big banks issuing more long-term debt?

Alan Simpson paints dire market outlook

Discount lobster not a hit with diners, or investors

Special dividends: Big waste of cash for tech

Banks book record profits off Fannie and Freddie

Investing: Where to make money in 2013

Municipal bonds: A train wreck waiting to happen

The defunct startup that beat Best Buy in court

EU slaps record $1.9B fine on cartel

Citigroup to slash 11,000 jobs

Jack Bogle: Vanguard's $2.2 trillion man

ECB sees gloomy 2013, but holds rates

Why you're right to be obsessed with Apple stock

Citigroup layoffs may not go far enough

Marc Lasry: I'm in cash because of cliff

We are working too hard

Is Obamacare killing medical device startups?

Don't believe the hype about special dividends

Aston Martin gets new Italian backer

Netflix CEO Hastings deserves SEC scrutiny