Your Money
Spanish bank bailout gets go-ahead

Startups will gain from GOP's immigration pain

Knight Capital stock surges on buyout offer from Getco

When to follow the barbarians

The fiscal cliff and private equity

British banks may need more capital

BlackRock's new bond plan

Why 'cheap' stocks aren't always good

Where's the stimulus, Obama?

Eurozone business mood ticks up

Cyber Monday gives eBay a big boost

Goldman Sachs to leave crime scene, exit CSI?

How to really stop (some) insider trading

Why Italian bonds are rallying

Aston Martin at risk of downgrade

Bond investors, beware

U.K. targets Google, Amazon, Starbucks on taxes

BlackRock: There's hidden value in CASSH

Costco's odd fiscal cliff dividend deal

The Fed is backing foreign banks into a corner
Мать обвиняется в убийстве своего 23-месячного малыша | строительство домов
Startups will gain from GOP's immigration pain
America's venture capitalists have spent the past several years begging Congress to make it easier for foreign-born entrepreneurs to enter the United States. The proposal is called Startup Visa, and finally may be on the verge of becoming law. Not on its merits (which are many), but because of electoral politics.

There have been a few different versions of Startup Visa floated, but the general idea would be to provide immigrant entrepreneurs with a two-year visa if they are able to find a qualified U.S. investor willing to invest a minimum of $100,000 in their startup. To keep the visa past the two years, the new company must have created at least five jobs and either (a) Raised at least $500,000 in additional funding, or (b) Be generating at least $500,000 in annual revenue.

Another provision would provide visas to entrepreneurs who started companies outside the U.S. that generated at least $100,000 in U.S. sales over the past 12 months. For such visas to be renewed after two years, the entrepreneur must have created at least three new U.S. jobs. Finally, startup visas could be extended to immigrant entrepreneurs in the U.S. on unexpired H-1B visas or who have certain types of graduate degrees, so long as they have at least $60,000 in assets (including more than $30,000 in annual income), and have secured at least a $20,000 commitment from a U.S. investor. Such entrepreneurs also would need to create three jobs over a two-year period, and either raise another $100,000 in investment or generate at least $100,000 in revenue.

In other words, make it easier for foreign entrepreneurs to create new companies and new jobs in America. If you're wondering who would oppose such a commonsense program, the answer is... well, nobody.

Republicans support it. Democrats support it. The problem, however, has been that neither side has been willing to actually bring it to a vote.

Republicans have wanted Startup Visa to be voted on as a standalone bill, perhaps in coordination with other legal immigration reforms like increasing the number of available H-1B visas. Democrats have refused, insisting that it be part of a more comprehensive immigration bill that addresses both legal and illegal immigration. And since the GOP interest in illegal immigration hasn't extended beyond building "the dang fence," Startup Visa has gone nowhere fast.

What changed this month, however, was that Republicans got steamrolled at the polls by growing numbers of Latino voters. So much so that several GOP leaders have conceded that they finally need to pass a comprehensive bill. Maybe not one that includes broad amnesty, but at least some version of the Dream Act, family reunification measures and a series of legal immigration reforms like Startup Visa.

"Before the election I thought there was zero chance of Startup Visa becoming law," says Vivek Wadhwa, a Silicon Valley academic who has long championed the idea. "But then Republicans got their asses kicked, and they now know they need to do something about immigration."

Jennifer Dowling, head of federal policy for the National Venture Capital Association, adds: "We're certainly heading into 2013 with a little momentum due to the election results, and I'm hoping that the ground has really shifted."

Для печати

Why aren't big banks issuing more long-term debt?

Alan Simpson paints dire market outlook

Discount lobster not a hit with diners, or investors

Special dividends: Big waste of cash for tech

Banks book record profits off Fannie and Freddie

Investing: Where to make money in 2013

Municipal bonds: A train wreck waiting to happen

The defunct startup that beat Best Buy in court

EU slaps record $1.9B fine on cartel

Citigroup to slash 11,000 jobs

Jack Bogle: Vanguard's $2.2 trillion man

ECB sees gloomy 2013, but holds rates

Why you're right to be obsessed with Apple stock

Citigroup layoffs may not go far enough

Marc Lasry: I'm in cash because of cliff

We are working too hard

Is Obamacare killing medical device startups?

Don't believe the hype about special dividends

Aston Martin gets new Italian backer

Netflix CEO Hastings deserves SEC scrutiny